 |
| Ericsson publishes a quick guide to the digital carbon footprint |
Measuring our digital fingerprint does not require complex scientific research to explain the fingerprint context and analyze all relevant frameworks. However, it does require in-depth knowledge of technology and its history, as well as its various uses. For this reason, Ericsson published a new report, "A Guide" to the Industry Lab Report. The fast carbon digital footprint highlights the carbon dioxide emissions from the ICT industry and reviews aspects that explain the effects of our current digital lifestyle on climate.
Many professional studies have given us a bleak and pessimistic picture as we study the reality and reality of the digital carbon footprint, especially when we predict the future, which prompted many interested people. To ask all the causes of this pessimism. As mentioned earlier, measuring a carbon footprint does not require complex theories, but rather a deep understanding of technology and industry. At the same time, many ancient theories complicating the topic have sprouted and created challenges. It impairs the ability of ordinary users to better understand and interact with existing facts.
Ericsson Quick Guide to Digital Carbon Footprint is designed to address the ambiguities related to the problem of ICT carbon footprint by measuring the use of different electrical devices.
The study includes greenhouse gas emissions related to the energy and materials used throughout the product life cycle, and assessment of the device life cycle is important because the device focuses on testing a product or service from manufacture to downtime or process (such as a product’s journey). Extracting raw materials from mines for disposal.
Digital carbon footprint
The climate impacts of ICTs are complex because they extend to three levels of impacts, including direct carbon emissions associated with the manufacture, use, and disposal of ICT products. These include, for example, the carbon footprint and indirect consequences of the use of information and communication technologies, or positive impacts such as changing travel habits, improving transportation practices and methods, and changing behavior and preferences.
For example, when reading headlines, reporting the impact of broadcasting services, or comparing the ICT ecological footprint with other sectors, you often focus on direct carbon dioxide emissions or what we call a digital carbon footprint, although there are other technological impacts It often outweighs the pollution.
Sample song, Despacito
In the spring of 2018, many media outlets announced that the very popular song Despacito had been downloaded about five billion times and required the same amount of electricity as Chad, Guinea-Bissau, Somalia, Sierra Leone and the Central African Republic battery. One year
Ericsson’s latest report to consumers and industry closely examined this example, and experts found that downloading this song to a smartphone would take about 0.005 terawatt hours five billion times, including its use in networks and data centers. Share it.
Downloading a song usually takes approximately 0.001 kWh, compared to about 1 terawatt of electricity consumed in these countries / regions in 2017 ("1 terawatt hour = billion kilowatt hour").
Bernella Bergmark, chief researcher at Ericsson and one of the authors of the Industry Lab report, commented on the results as follows: “Although the report may show users that their digital footprint is below expectations, it cannot be used as an argument for failure to protect and protect the environment as long as Ericsson is considered An engine to demonstrate that digital technology will cut carbon dioxide emissions in half by 2030, and Ericsson is the world leader after cleaning up. The Industrial Revolution caused global warming by about 1.5 ° C.