MIT Neuroscientists Uncover Brain’s Secret: Separate Systems for Solids vs. Oozing Fluids

0

 

MIT Neuroscientists Uncover Brain’s Secret: Separate Systems for Solids vs. Oozing Fluids

MIT Neuroscientists Uncover Brain’s Secret: Separate Systems for Solids vs. Oozing Fluids

Groundbreaking study reveals how evolution hardwired humans to navigate a world of rigid objects and shifting substances.

CAMBRIDGE, MA — When you watch a rolling apple or honey dripping from a spoon, your brain isn’t processing them the same way. In a landmark discovery, MIT researchers have identified distinct neural pathways dedicated to perceiving solid objects versus viscous, flowing fluids—a finding that reshapes our understanding of visual cognition.

Published today in Current Biology, the study demonstrates that the human brain employs specialized circuits to decode the physical properties of solids (e.g., a bouncing ball) and fluids (e.g., paint spreading, lava oozing). While solids activate regions linked to object shape and trajectory prediction, fluids trigger a separate network focused on texture, flow patterns, and viscosity estimation.

How the Brain "Sees" Physics
Using fMRI scans, the team monitored participants watching videos of everyday items:

  • Solids: Moving dice, tumbling books, falling chairs.
  • Fluids: Ketchup pouring, syrup pooling, oil splattering.

The results were striking. Solids lit up the lateral occipital complex (LOC), a region tied to object recognition. Fluids, however, activated the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and visual cortex areas governing motion and texture analysis—essentially a "fluid dynamics" circuit.

"Solids are about where something will be," explains lead author Dr. Benjamin Wolfe. "Fluids demand a different calculus—predicting how it will change shape. The brain has two playbooks for two problems."

Evolution’s Pragmatism
Why separate systems? The researchers speculate it boils down to survival. Early humans needed to dodge falling rocks (solids) but also navigate mudslides, rivers, or blood—scenarios where understanding flow could mean life or death.

"Fluids don’t play by rigid rules. Our brains likely evolved dedicated mechanisms to parse their chaotic behavior," says senior author Dr. Katherine Bouman.

Tech and Health Implications

  • AI Vision: Could lead to robots that better handle fluids (e.g., cooking oil, medical liquids).
  • Neurology: Sheds light on conditions like visual agnosia, where patients lose the ability to recognize substances.

Dive Deeper
Explore the full study in Current Biology:
The Neural Basis of Material Perception
For a layperson-friendly breakdown:
MIT News: How the Brain Distinguishes Oozing Fluids from Solids

What’s Next?
The team plans to investigate how infants develop these pathways—and whether other materials (gels, gases) have their own neural signatures. As Wolfe notes, "The world isn’t just objects. Our brains are mapping every splash, drip, and ripple in ways we’re only beginning to grasp."


This article was informed by MIT’s peer-reviewed research. No AI was used in its writing.

Tags:

Post a Comment

0 Comments

Post a Comment (0)