![]() |
| The Apple Studio Display XDR offers greater processing power than the new MacBook Neo. |
A firmware update reveals that Apple’s newest monitors pack more processing power than the brand-new $599 MacBook Neo, sparking debate about the laptop’s value proposition.
In a week of major Apple hardware announcements, a peculiar silicon story has emerged. While Apple unveiled the all-new MacBook Neo—its first new laptop line in over a decade—as an affordable entry point for $599, details uncovered by MacRumors suggest the computer’s processor is already being outperformed by the chips inside the company’s latest monitors.
The MacBook Neo is powered by the A18 Pro chip, the same processor that debuted in the iPhone 16 Pro series in 2024. While Apple markets the Neo as being up to 50% faster than competing PCs, early performance metrics paint a different picture when compared to Apple’s own history.
According to internal benchmarks and comparisons, the A18 Pro in the MacBook Neo delivers performance that is roughly on par with the M1 chip found in the 2020 MacBook Air. For context, that M1 MacBook Air—Apple’s entry-level laptop from five years ago—still sells on the market, with current models starting around $950 on Amazon. This means users buying the “all-new” Neo in 2026 are getting performance similar to a 2020 machine, albeit in a new chassis and at a lower price.
The Display Dilemma: A19 Power vs. A18 Pro
The narrative took an ironic turn this week when Apple announced its new Studio Display and high-end Studio Display XDR. While the company’s press release focused on the stunning 5K visuals and the new Desk View camera feature, it was the code in the first firmware update that revealed the real story.
As first reported by MacRumors, the standard Studio Display is equipped with an A19 chip, while the flagship Studio Display XDR houses the A19 Pro—the very same chip found in the iPhone 17 Pro.
This means that the processor inside a standalone monitor is architecturally newer and more powerful than the one powering Apple’s brand-new laptop.
To visualize the performance hierarchy, here is how the new silicon stacks up against existing hardware in Geekbench 6.5 benchmarks:
| Device | Chipset | Single-Core Score | Multi-Core Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | M5 (10-Core) | 4326 (100%) | 18054 (100%) |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | A19 Pro | 3883 (90%) | 10017 (55%) |
| Apple iPhone 17 | A19 | 3732 (86%) | 9456 (52%) |
| Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | A18 Pro | 3479 (80%) | 8568 (47%) |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | M1 | 2363 (55%) | 8622 (48%) |
| Apple MacBook Neo (2026) | A18 Pro | ~3479 (80%) | ~8568 (47%) |
As the table illustrates, the MacBook Neo’s A18 Pro essentially trades blows with the 2020 M1 in multi-core tasks and beats it in single-core, but it is noticeably outpaced by the A19 chip found in the new displays and the iPhone 17.
Why Do Monitors Need Such Powerful Chips?
Apple is not positioning the new Studio Displays as standalone computers. Unlike the short-lived Samsung M8 “smart monitor,” these displays still require a Mac to function. So why the processing power?
The A-series chips in the displays handle the advanced camera and audio systems. The original 2022 Studio Display used an A13 Bionic to power “Hey Siri” and Center Stage. The new A19 chips enable a new feature called Desk View, which uses the 12MP camera to simultaneously show the user’s face and a top-down view of their desk during video calls.
However, given the sheer horsepower of the A19 Pro in the high-end XDR model, industry watchers speculate that Apple is future-proofing these displays. The processing power could potentially enable future features, such as running a streamlined version of macOS or acting as an Apple TV device, without requiring a software update that would bottleneck older chips.
The User Verdict
The reaction on forums has been swift. As one MacRumors user commented, “It’s funny how a display is more powerful than a newly released full-fledged computer.” Another noted, “Monitors with chips straight up more powerful than a newly announced laptop...interesting times.”
The pricing adds another layer to the discussion:
- The MacBook Neo (A18 Pro) starts at $599.
- The Studio Display (A19) starts at $1,599.
- The Studio Display XDR (A19 Pro) starts at $3,299.
For the price of one Studio Display XDR, a user could buy five MacBook Neo laptops, yet the monitor contains the superior processor.
The Bottom Line
Apple’s strategy appears to be one of aggressive segmentation. The MacBook Neo, aimed at students and budget buyers, utilizes the 2024 iPhone chip to hit a $599 price point. It is a modern, low-cost entry into the Apple ecosystem. However, for users paying attention to the specs, the cognitive dissonance is hard to ignore: the most affordable Mac in years is powered by a chip that is technically a generation behind the silicon inside the company’s premium peripherals.
As the March 11 launch date approaches for all these devices, the real-world performance of the MacBook Neo will be put to the test. For now, the narrative is clear: Apple’s monitors are not just windows to your Mac; in terms of raw chip power, they are quickly becoming more advanced than the Macs themselves.
You can view Apple’s official announcement for the new displays here.
