![]() |
| Samsung Galaxy Watch9 review |
Our Galaxy Watch9 review unit arrived alongside Samsung’s latest foldable flagship, the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra. While the hardware is impressive, real-world testing reveals a frustrating connectivity gap that undermines the promise of a seamless Samsung ecosystem.
Immediately after the initial setup, we took both devices out for a spin. In real-world use, a familiar and inconvenient scenario emerged: if the smartwatch runs out of battery while you are away from home and the charging puck is sitting on your desk, things get complicated quickly. Since Galaxy smartphones feature “Wireless PowerShare,” it would be a massive advantage in everyday life if the wearable could be topped up using the phone's battery. This feature was a staple of older generations, making its absence sting even more.
The Persistent Issue with Wireless PowerShare
Unfortunately, despite the premium nature of both devices, the Watch9 does not charge on the back of the Fold 8 Ultra. This isn't just a minor annoyance; it is a significant pain point given that battery life remains a major shortcoming of the Watch9. When the watch dies on the go, you are left stranded without a power source.
This incompatibility isn't a new bug; it dates back to the Galaxy Watch 7. The introduction of the new BioActive sensor increased the physical distance between the charging coil and the watch case. As a result, the Fold 8 Ultra simply cannot bridge that distance wirelessly.
While it is technically understandable that third-party devices can’t be charged wirelessly by Samsung smartphones due to proprietary standards, it is incredibly frustrating that the company’s top-tier smartwatch cannot communicate with its flagship smartphone. Restoring this convenience in future models would be highly desirable. After all, few users carry the charging pad with them everywhere they go.
Check the latest price for the Samsung Galaxy Watch9 on Amazon
Samsung’s Ecosystem Promise is Only Partially Fulfilled
A premium ecosystem should ensure that flagship products work seamlessly together across generations. For a device costing upwards of $400, the inability to leech power from a $1,800 smartphone feels like a step backward. For future generations of the Galaxy Watch, a technical adjustment that once again enables charging via a Samsung smartphone—despite the use of modern sensors—is essential.
Without this compatibility, Wireless PowerShare loses its intended utility in everyday life, leaving users to wonder: Is the smartwatch sensor more important than the ecosystem? For now, users are forced to choose between having the latest health tracking technology and having a device that works harmoniously with their phone.
Source: Notebookcheck



